Title: Next Craccum Editor?
Description: Who will you be voting for?
Steveo - August 11, 2005 11:10 PM (GMT)
Its kind of pointless but it shows our support :P
SheDevil - August 12, 2005 01:35 AM (GMT)
You forgot Thomas and Anthony?! Add them too. Who the hell is voting for rod and tod, or whatever the fuck their names are!?
samf - August 12, 2005 10:18 AM (GMT)
Looks like it's Ryan in a landslide. Good.
Steveo - August 12, 2005 10:20 AM (GMT)
Except for the d*cks that voted for other options
samf - August 12, 2005 10:23 AM (GMT)
If Ryan doesn't win - god forbid - hopefully Katie will do it. Her posters are class.
El Matador - August 12, 2005 10:25 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
samf Posted on Aug 12 2005, 10:18 PM
Looks like it's Ryan in a landslide. Good.
|
samf - August 12, 2005 10:28 AM (GMT)
It's Ryan in a figure of speech for victory. Get it now? :P Geez...
El Matador - August 12, 2005 10:29 AM (GMT)
Yea I know, I just can't help being a tool sometimes.
samf - August 12, 2005 10:32 AM (GMT)
It was an excellently done piece of toolishness, I must admit.
Yeliah - August 12, 2005 10:39 AM (GMT)
It better be Ryan. Well, I hope it's Ryan at least. If it isn't him, then I hope it's Katie. If Anthony and whatshisface get in, it's all over. I was sort of um...a titch er..."mean" to them when they tried to give me a flier the other day. *shrug* Oh well.
samf - August 12, 2005 10:41 AM (GMT)
I don't know anything about those guys at all...
Fez - August 13, 2005 12:44 AM (GMT)
FFS We have traitorous goons on this board!
Lynch!
kiwi_hockey_guy - August 13, 2005 01:12 AM (GMT)
WOW i can vote for more than one option..... i chose 2
Hauser - August 13, 2005 01:17 AM (GMT)
Where be our white hoods and nooses!
Zoot - August 13, 2005 04:35 AM (GMT)
Yep. Out of the candidates, you can only be certain that Katie and I have the experience and the ability to actually do the job (of course, I will do the job excellently). Katie's contributed both last year and this year, and I've contributed this year more than anyone else. As for the others...
T&A are claiming to have been contributing for three years and that they therefore know how Craccum works. It's true they've been contributing for three years, in that they wrote one article in '03, a few beer reviews in '04 and one publishable piece this year (and one unpublishable one). If they know how to run a magazine and if they have a "passion for student media", they didn't get these things from Craccum.
Rod & Todd have even less experience with Craccum than that, having written, to our knowledge, nothing at all. If you hadn't guessed from their flyers ("friggin' heck, yeah!" is actually pretty awesome, if you ask me), they're both Christians, from Greenlane Somethingorother Centre. Of course, they could well be perfectly capable of doing the job, and being Christian doesn't necessarily inhibit one's ability to be awesome - GAN man Chris Orsky is one of Craccum's most talented contributors, and he's Christian. But they don't appear to be putting much more effort into their campaign than they've put into contributing throughout the year.
If T&A look like any kind of concern next week, I may start concluding my lecture speaks with, "If you really must vote for someone other than me, vote for Katie."
Fez - August 13, 2005 04:44 AM (GMT)
Awww shit Ryan I will seriously be very very very depressed if you dont win.
You are such a nice guy and it just wouldnt be fucking fair.
Zoot - August 13, 2005 04:53 AM (GMT)
Well, we'll see. Katie's pretty nice too, and she's been contributing for longer. I'm fairly certain she'll see it as unfair if I win. Meanwhile, I've been contributing far more and regularly this year than she has. Both of us "deserve" it, in one way or another.
So many people have offered and given their time and talent to my campaign that if I don't win, I'm going to have an array of people to apologise to. I am very optimistic about my chances, but failure is at least a possibility. I know I'm the best for the job, but then, I also knew that Conor was best for the presidential job. If enough people vote who are sucked in by flyers given out by girls in tight "vote Thomas and Anthony" T-shirts, the student body misses out on the best possible editor. So it goes.
Katie and I also have an agreement that whoever does win will contribute for the other next year.
the oob - August 13, 2005 04:57 AM (GMT)
I for one want these guys that everyone hates to win.
Zoot - August 13, 2005 05:00 AM (GMT)
I take your opinion seriously! Even though I've read your disclaimer!
Fez - August 13, 2005 05:09 AM (GMT)
oh god but no offense to Katie, but serious craccums dont work.
Its like SheDevil has said many times, your'e sense of humour is really going to help next years craccum from not sucking next year.
if its going to end up being another garland fest Ill be glad Im only at uni a semester next year
El Matador - August 13, 2005 06:15 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Zoot @ Aug 13 2005, 04:53 PM) |
| Katie and I also have an agreement that whoever does win will contribute for the other next year. |
So if she's boring and serious, does that mean you can go Batshit insane to provide balance?
the oob - August 13, 2005 07:29 AM (GMT)
You know, the wise thing to do might be to join forces with Kate (co-editors), thus combining your voting bases. Less reward, but less risk.
Hauser - August 13, 2005 07:47 AM (GMT)
But that will be impurification of Ryan's platform, Oob.
And Ryan, some weird fucker was wandering around my street as I walked from the taxi...you weren't mugged along Mt Eden road yesterday were you ? :P
the oob - August 13, 2005 11:23 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| But that will be impurification of Ryan's platform, Oob. |
Remember what happened with the Auckland mayoral elections a while back: the left was split between two similar candidates, so Banksie won. In this case, the 'sensible majority' could be split, and the 'douchebag minority' could win the election.
What's the word for when you have the highest portion but not the majority? Someone remind me. For instance:
option a: 35%
option b: 40% <-- what's that called?
option c: 25%
Zoot - August 13, 2005 10:28 PM (GMT)
I dunno what it's called. No, Hauser, didn't get mugged, though I was too drunk to remember if I did.
| QUOTE |
| You know, the wise thing to do might be to join forces with Kate (co-editors), thus combining your voting bases. Less reward, but less risk. |
"Less reward, but less risk," is the opposite of how I want to live my life, and it's for that exact reason that I'm running alone.
And yes, a little batshit insanity will balance a little seriousness.
I was considering sending a horde from O'Rorke down to cover Parachute.
kiwi_hockey_guy - August 14, 2005 12:25 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| I was considering sending a horde from O'Rorke down to cover Parachute. |
FUcking golden!
Fez - August 14, 2005 01:33 AM (GMT)
yea man thatd be awesome
better yet, send us!
Steveo - August 14, 2005 01:56 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Fez @ Aug 14 2005, 01:33 PM) |
yea man thatd be awesome
better yet, send us! |
I'd hate to think what the end result would be if that happened. Drunken tom-foolery at the golf course would just be the beginning of their problems
Fez - August 14, 2005 05:50 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Steveo @ Aug 14 2005, 01:56 PM) |
| QUOTE (Fez @ Aug 14 2005, 01:33 PM) | yea man thatd be awesome
better yet, send us! |
I'd hate to think what the end result would be if that happened. Drunken tom-foolery at the golf course would just be the beginning of their problems
|
I would make it my mission to dress up as a small preteen innocent christian boy and find any potential peadophile priests and seduce them.
Happy Ahmed - August 14, 2005 05:52 AM (GMT)
I'd dress up as a potential paedophile priest. :naughty:
Steveo - August 14, 2005 06:13 AM (GMT)
Sounds like Ahmed will need no seducing
Sardonic - August 14, 2005 11:39 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (samf @ Aug 12 2005, 10:18 PM) |
| Looks like it's Ryan in a landslide. Good. |
Erm... I think the presidential poll had conor by a landslide as well!
templar34 - August 14, 2005 11:47 PM (GMT)
Hare Krshna mission to Parachute anyone :P? Shave our heads and wear robes, and sing badly with loudspeakers :cloak:
SheDevil - August 14, 2005 11:56 PM (GMT)
I favour going dressed as the devil and walking around with a placard saying, "you can be saved, turn to the dark side!". And offering to corrupt young christian boys, they don't know what they're missing out on.
El Matador - August 15, 2005 02:58 AM (GMT)
Wow, Rodd and Todd get off on completely the wrong foot by insulting their readers in their intro piece in Craccum.
How not to write an election piece 101: Insult the voters.
SheDevil - August 15, 2005 03:02 AM (GMT)
Wow, Thomas and Anthony totally got :flame: in that quad forum. Good luck climbing out of that hole. Roy & Todd didn't really make an impact.....at all, but what would you expect from Christian boys, the blonde one's cute though. Katie did well, i still think she comes across as a bit of a raving feminist. And then there was Ryan.......call me biased but he won that forum hands down, superb! :P
El Matador - August 15, 2005 03:13 AM (GMT)
Wow. We both started posts with Wow.
Wow.
SheDevil - August 15, 2005 03:15 AM (GMT)
Wow. I know. Wow, i did that deliberatley.
Fuck i hate that word.
El Matador - August 15, 2005 03:20 AM (GMT)
Lol. Note to templar; be careful how you convey the state of wonder that ShedEvil leaves you in....
SheDevil - August 15, 2005 03:24 AM (GMT)
Meaning? I'm sorry Sloanie, that was a little sarcastic of me, wasn't it? ^_^