Some the atricles/content are disgusting and derogatory...

The best example in this weeks issue is WWJF

ppl are gonna say you can post anything in cracum, but sometimes they are going way over the limit

I haven't seen it, but guessing: WWJF = Who Would Jesus Fuck?

I think it is actually not bad for a piece of pseudo-christian propaganda. He makes a good point and whats better is that he isn't doing the whole, "i'm perfect and going to heaven, you're a sinner and you're going to hell" bullshit. I like a christian who can see beyond all the blatant misgivings that come with Christianity. Some one who can see sense and take from christianity what he wants and can, not the whole package shoved down his throat, blindly believeing the lies often fed to the masses.

i agree that he has a good view on the world...there is nothing worse to me than somebody with blind faith in something completely irrelevant...except i suppose when they try and do the whole conversion thing...i should make a banner "jesus turned some of my best friends against me"...

Mmm, nice. That would make quite a pertinent statement. In 4th form my friend turned Christian and she went on at me for hours about how i was going to hell because of my beliefs etc etc.

Haha, when I was around 8 my Mormon friend told me (though not in these words) that the rapture was coming at the end of the Millenium and that only Mormons would be saved... I didn't give it much thought though. I guess you could call this hell, but I was expecting more pitchforks and flames.

I know a guy that was bitching about the layout of craccum, I didnt comment much.

Sorry, i'm trying, but without my little devil outfit i don't really feel the part enough to give you what you want, the devil isn't very menacing when she doesn't have her horns or pitchfork to prod you with.

And if poeple don't like the layout of Craccum, or the articles tell them to email their complaints to the editors, they love hatemail, it fuels them!

Alec: craccum.editor :at: auckland.ac.nz
Stian: craccum2005 :at: auckland.ac.nz

"I'll prod you with my pitchfork" is some great innuendo.

I know :naughty: That's why i say it, i love innuendo, like the new bloodhound gang song, classic. "In-your-end-o" Ha!

Really?

I thought layuot was done by Nick?

It is, but we tell him what to do, if something isn't working we tell him to change it. He just does it like this because the editors don't care and leave him to his own devices, but it differs from editor to editor. Garland was quite involved in the design layout if i recall. But we can go to nick and tell him to do things differently. That's not a problem, he works for us after all, we're the boss!

lanky bobs i can stare at your avatar for hours

I just don't get the Jessica Alba fixation! She really isn't that hot, but a lot of people think she is, ah well.

SheDevil, if you can provide me with a .gif of yourself doing similar, I'd gladly have it as my avatar. That stands for any female on this board, and sloanie.

We just fixate on Jessica Alba because we can't have you.

I'll work on that .gif for you ;)

im sure sloanie will be more than willing ;)

Yeah, Sloanie should do one like his old avatar, in a pink undie twinset peeling away the jacket whilst wriggling around! ROFL! :hilarious:

I think that would be the best avatar ever!

I am annoyed that you find some half baked article semi abusing jesus - a subject which I have always stayed away from because it is way too easy - to be offensive, and have not bothered to complain about my beautifully crafted symphonies of mutilation.

because a lot of people cant understand what the fuck when they read your articles

they are ahead of their time.

Are you bitter about the awards night, mayhaps? Teehee.

Fez, I think you meant he is ahead of his readers' time.

But anyway, apart from the fact that it's indescribably lame to get "offended" over such articles, at least feedback - good, bad or otherwise - is telling the editors that you're reading their rag of filth anyway. They love it.